An interesting discussion of the premises of Marx that were not necessarily incorrect. Tom Woods expounds on an article written by Hans-Hermann Hoppe, who picks out five foundational statements on Marxism, explains in what way they're right, and how Marx distorted those truths and made them incoherent.
The Property and Freedom annual meet occurred just a few days ago. A page on the Property and Freedom website from December 2016 boasts an intriguing line-up, reproduced below, although I have no idea if this reflects the final list of those that addressed the conference. Keep an eye out on the Property and Freedom… Continue reading The Coming Property and Freedom Talks
These are some preliminary thoughts I have on the legal legitimacy of intellectual property, which may be liable to change once I've researched this subject more scrupulously. I don't believe that design models should be protected. Let's use the products of three major corporations as examples - McDonalds, Nike trainers and the iPhone. If an… Continue reading Intellectual Property in an Ideal World
"The essence of the Marxian philosophy is this: We are right because we are the spokesmen of the rising proletarian class. Discursive reasoning cannot invalidate our teachings, for they are inspired by the supreme power that determines the destiny of mankind. Our adversaries are wrong because they lack the intuition that guides our minds. It… Continue reading Mises Elucidates the Marxian Philosophy
A few months ago, I got chatting to some representatives of the Socialist Workers Party at their table on one of Cardiff's high streets. Not knowing anything about them, I asked the usual cursory questions: “Are you Marxists? How do you feel about Stalin's legacy? Are you Trotskyists? What's your position on Lenin?” As I… Continue reading “That’s Not Real Capitalism” – a Herculean Hurdle